John Riddell: Democracy in Lenin's Comintern

How did Communist parties handle issues of internal discipline and democracy in Lenin’s time? The recent intense discussion within the British Socialist Workers’ Party (SWP) and beyond has heard claims that the SWP rests on the traditions of democratic centralism inherited from the Bolsheviks.

John Riddell: Democracy in Lenin's Comintern

Richard Atkinson: Death and the Bedroom Tax

Some extended thoughts about Stephanie Bottrill, the woman who committed suicide because of the bedroom tax.

Richard Atkinson: Death and the Bedroom Tax

Dave Renton: Who Was Blair Peach?

Today marks the 35th anniversary of the killing of Blair Peach by the police. David Renton looks back at Blair Peach’s life as a poet, trade unionist and committed antifascist

Dave Renton: Who Was Blair Peach?

Bunny La Roche: Nasty Little Nigel gets a rude welcome to Kent

Bunny La Roche of RS21 on Nigel Farage's visit to Kent

Bunny La Roche: Nasty Little Nigel gets a rude welcome to Kent

Financial Appeal

We're up and running! An appeal for funds to kickstart the IS Network

Financial Appeal

Bob Crow (1961–2014)

Bob Crow


Kevin Crane on the death of a defining figure of the ‘awkward squad’.

The entire British labour movement received with shock the news that Rail Maritime and Transport workers’ union (RMT) general secretary Bob Crow had died suddenly, aged only 52.  Tributes have poured in for a man who was one of Britain’s best known trade unionist and socialist public figures

Bob Crow joined the London Underground aged 16 in the grade then known as “junior railwayman”.  In later years he would point out that in today’s job structure, this would have made him a cleaner.  He joined the union, which was then called the National Union of Railwaymen (the RMT was formed by a merger between this and National Union of Seamen in 1990), straight away and he became heavily involved, rising steadily from being a representative to a regional and then eventually national official, gaining a reputation for being a talented and passionate activist.  He was only 30 years old when he became the union’s assistant general secretary.

Politically, Crow always strongly identified as being on the radical left – avowedly not the centre left.  Like many militants within the union leaderships, he had been in the Communist Party.  When this dissolved, he did not follow the majority of members into Labour, which was beginning the process of becoming “New Labour” at this time in the 1990s. Instead he remained in what was left of the Communist organisation, eventually enthusiastically joining Arthur Scargill’s Socialist Labour Party to run against New Labour during Blair’s ascendancy in 1997.  Although this project was not a success in establishing a radical left party in Britain, Crow stayed committed to building a socialist working class alternative to Labour and was one of Britain’s most prominent sceptics that the party could in some way be “reclaimed” for the left.

In 2002 the RMT’s long standing general secretary Roger Knapp died and Crow was elected by a convincing lead to replace him.  By this time in the early 2000s, Crow had become part of a new generation of leaders who were starting to rise within the unions.  Severe tensions were developing between the aspirations of the trade union movement, which was striving to undo the serious damage it had suffered during the Thatcher years, and the avowedly neoliberal government of New Labour, and one expression of this was the election of a series of new leadership figures who were more openly socialist and much more willing, at least rhetorically, to speak out against Labour policy and the neoliberal economic orthodoxy. The press dubbed this loose grouping the “awkward squad”, and, even before he’d won the election, Bob Crow had become its public face.  The right wing press launched hatchet job articles on him straight away, with the Sun labelling him “Public Enemy Number One”.  Little over a month before his election, Crow was beaten by a gang of men outside his own home – he had always been sure that this was an attack whipped up by employers’ agitation.

As the RMT’s top official, Crow quickly made a name from himself as vocal, direct and unafraid to use confrontation to achieve gains for transport workers.  He was, and to an extent still is, the only instantly recognisable trade unionist in Britain.  Under his leadership, his home region of the union in London Transport built up extremely strong and active workplace organisation.  London Underground, at this time, was in the early stages of a series of highly unpopular and ultimately disastrous neoliberal reorganisations and the unions fought a number of major industrial actions to defend terms and conditions.  Although the popular media depiction of Crow as unwilling and unable to compromise was certainly not true, it is the case that he was resolutely committed to opposing privatisation on London underground. Relations between himself and the left wing mayor Ken Livingstone, who had won the mayoralty against an official Labour candidate on specific promise to oppose neoliberalism on London underground, completely soured over an employment conditions dispute in 2004. Crow angrily resigned from his position on the Transport for London board and Livingstone went to the press to tell RMT members to scab on the union. The strikers themselves held firm and won a significant defensive victory.

Despite being held up in the press by most mainstream political figures as an unacceptable face of trade unionism, Crow could point to a track record in office that was impressive by any measure. The RMT grew from around 57,000 members in 2002 to around 80,000 in 2008, at a time when the rest of British trade union movement was in almost universal decline. The RMT became one of the most controversial institutions in Britain: despised by the right as one of the few unions that could still organise effective and visible workers’ strikes, celebrated by the left as proof that it was still possible to organise workers in their own defence.

Crow’s ambitions were not always successful.  He continued to be active in searching for more radical working class political representation, successfully opening up the RMT’s political fund to enable it to financially support the (then electorally successful) Scottish Socialist Party and entering into talks with Respect, getting the RMT officially expelled from the Labour party (ironically, the union then obtained a larger parliamentary group by sponsoring individual MPs). Crow continued to back union support for electoral alternatives, but these have not resulted in breakthroughs.

The bigger project still, and what Crow had very hoped to be his monument, was the campaign to completely renew transport unionism, by merging the RMT with the two smaller, more specialised, TSSA and ASLEF unions.  It was Crow’s hope that by bringing these venerable, but weak in membership and finance, unions into a new single rail industry union, that it would be possible to roll out the RMT’s growth to the rest of the British transport network.  Despite goodwill from many quarters, this project did not come to pass. A combination of conservatism and genuine difficulties regarding union structures and policies prevented mergers from occurring, though it does seem likely that Crow would not have given.

Bob Crow’s sudden death leaves much work that he would have wanted finished, now unresolved. His big ambitions of leading a real rebirth of industrial trade unionism and the establishment of a new socialist political project weren’t achieved, which is what makes his untimely death a particularly serious loss to the entire movement.  He’s also not someone socialists would never have had differences with.  Like any union leader, there were times when his view on the direction of dispute was sometimes at odds with the workers on the ground, which quite simply goes with the territory of being a full-time official and not a day-to-day member of the workforce.  His political positions were also, sometimes, contradictory or problematic: in 2008 he alternated between condemning the highly nationalistic “British Jobs for British Workers” slogan, to appearing to condone it later on, and the NO2EU protest party that he backed in the 2009 and 2014 European elections utilises some of the same rhetoric, blaming the EU for neoliberal attacks that are carried out just as severely by the British government.

But it would be a mistake to say that Crow hasn’t had a huge impact on trade union and left wing politics in Britain, indeed he’s been one of the most significant figures of a generation.  As mentioned before, most British people would struggle to name any trade unionists other than Bob Crow. His direct style was easy for critics to mock, but it wasn’t easy to ignore. The RMT is a relatively minor union in terms of membership, but leaders of the major unions have been much less effective at getting their points of view across in the media, and more to the point are not able to claim to have significantly increased the numbers of workers they organise despite years of high profile mergers.

The RMT during the Crow years showed that even in these days of entrenched neoliberalism, workers could be organised, fight and win. Bob Crow wasn’t the first member of the so-called awkward squad, but it could well be argued he was its defining member.  When Len McClusky of the massive Unite the Union appears in public praising social movements, condemning capitalism and calling on working class people to take action, it is Bob Crow’s style he is borrowing from, not the style of his predecessors in the old Transport & General Workers Union.  Crow will be remembered as a trade unionist and a socialist, and for showing that the movement did, in fact, have a future after the Thatcher attacks and for helping to shape what that future was likely to be.


This article was originally published at

Add a comment

Bob Crow - RIP

It is with great sadness that we learn of the death of Bob Crow, general secretary of the Railways, Maritime and Transport Union (RMT), at the age of 52. Our thoughts and condolences are with his family, friends and comrades at this difficult time.

Bob was a significant presence on the left and in the Trade Union movement, a champion of defending the jobs and safety of London Underground workers and a fighting trade unionist who was willing to push forward the interests of the working class, even when that meant he went through periods of intense personal attack.

We are thankful for his dedication to the fight and take heart that the militant workers of the RMT will continue a fitting legacy of struggle.

International Socialist Network

Add a comment

Bureaucrats, resistance networks and struggle in post-industrial capitalism: a further comment on “rank and file” strategies

Tim Nelson’s piece, 'Broad Lefts or Rank and File',[1] presents an excellent case against the all-too-common practice of treating the election of left wing union officials as the main aim of socialist workplace militancy. The defeats since 2011 and the crisis in the SWP have given many cause to reconsider the alternatives to that, and to look towards new strategies for 'trade unionism from below'. Nonetheless, it may be that we are as far away as ever from that revolutionary Philosopher’s Stone: an insurgent rank and file workers’ movement.

Add a comment

Read more: Bureaucrats, resistance networks and struggle in post-industrial capitalism: a further comment on...

Looking back in anger – The Miners’ Strike 30 years on

With new papers released by the National Archives about the Miners’ Strike the Anticapitalist Initiative’s Chris Strafford caught up with Harry Paterson, author of the upcoming book Look Back in Anger: The Miners’ Strike in Nottinghamshire 30 years on, to discuss what we have learnt.

Add a comment

Read more: Looking back in anger – The Miners’ Strike 30 years on

Paul Summers: IS Network trade union caucus report

Just a little personal anecdote from the recent trade union caucus:

I was pleased today to be able to attend the first of the IS Network's trade union caucus meetings. It felt good to talk with comrades from the IS Network and beyond about our modest efforts to change the world, to contribute to making it a better place for/with the mass of the population, our class. And it was NOT one of those "when this pub closes" discussions either...each journey starts with the first step.

Most of us talked about the effort and courage shown by students and low paid, precariat, zero hours contracted workers - and the need to engage with, relate to, and organise with them.

As one of the "68" generation ("old hacks"), we need to differentiate what is useful knowledge of our experience from what is currently no longer of much relevance or use.

Sometimes that can seem abstract - as a retired worker, I no longer have to contend directly with the pressures, demands and degree of exploitation imposed on younger workers.

But then I get home, and those impacts are hot on my tail: my daughter works in exactly those conditions, to assist her to make her way through university and reduce her debt. So she gives the managers a lot of notice that she cannot work next Saturday due to family commitments that she wants to take part in. Now I hear she is incensed with unsurprising rage, as yet again managers simply act like she has said nothing, and she's rostered for a shift next Saturday, despite offering to do a shift on another day when no one else wants to do it!

This is more evidence that managers simply ride us and ride on our efforts. To her credit, she shows some interest in joining a union, building a union - but like many of my younger comrades have said, and i do NOT make light of it, it’s hard - times are very hard!

We have to hope, we have to believe, that one of the points of organising together is that we collectively remember and learn from our history. Individually it makes sense that we do not always remember, but as a collective we need to remember and learn. If we are capable, it is because we stand on the shoulders of giants - those who went before us, and may well have faced similar problems, even if in different specific circumstances before us. We need to pass the lessons on and adapt them to new circumstances. We may only be able to make modest steps but I believe the effort is worth it.

So this is sent with solidarity greetings for all those who dare to struggle, dare to try, dare to win!

I post this with a musical link, because I also believe in trying to lift our spirits:

Add a comment

A contribution to the discussion on rank and file movements

The following piece was submitted by Martin Ralph, a comrade in the International Socialist League, based in Liverpool. It is a contribution to the ongoing debate within the IS Network, and the wider revolutionary movement, about the ongoing need for and possibilities of creating a rank and file movement within this country.

How different would the situation be today for workers if the unions had continued the fight to secure public sector pensions in November 2011?  Millions would now confidently mobilise in the knowledge they were in a struggle and united fight against the government’s attacks on wages, jobs and benefits.

That retreat by the union bureaucracies in this and subsequent struggles such as by the majority leaderships of the CWU, NUT and Unite (at Grangemouth) make it very clear today that new rank and file struggles and leaders need to emerge and the bureaucratic stranglehold over the unions needs to be fought.

While many national leaderships retreat a number of local disputes in the UK have won involving different unions and workplaces.

On the picket lines, in November and December, of the FBU, and UCU, Unison and Unite in HE, and UCU in FE discussion often turned to the need for joint national strikes. The TUC Congress voted for united action; however, no union has prepared for it. Which union has called all their branches and joint shop stewards' committees to discuss united action and discuss with other union branches, trades councils and social movements, such as the anti-bedroom tax? To our knowledge, none.

Add a comment

Read more: A contribution to the discussion on rank and file movements